POLICY & INFORMATION
INSPIREE Journal will adheres to the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers. We encourage journal editors to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors and to refer reviewers to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers as appropriate. Allegations of misconduct will be investigated in accordance with the COPE Best Practice Guidelines as far as is practicable. If notified of a potential breach of publication ethics, we encourage journal editors and staff to inform their OUP contact as soon as possible.
All submitted manuscripts are evaluated by editorial staff. Those Manuscript evaluated by editors to be inappropiate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscript evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double bilnd Peer reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities : rejected, revision required, or accepted.
The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published. Review Process:
1. Initial Manuscript Evaluation
The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English/Indonesian language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review.
2. Type of Peer Review
INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review employs double bilnd reviewing, where the referees remain anonymous throughout the process. Referees are assigned to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated.
3. Referee Reports
Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work. Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.
4. Final Report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.
5. Editor’s Decision is final
Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
|Aim & Scope|
|Peer Review Process|
|Peer Reviewers List|
|Instructions for Authors|
|Author Fees & APC|
|Open Access Policy|
|Screening Plagiarism Policy|
|Copyright and License|
|Sponsorship, Subscriber & MoU|
|Tuanku Tambusai Street, No. 23 Bangkinang City|
|Kampar Districts, Riau Province, Indonesia, 28412.|
|This work is licensed under a|
|Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.|