POLICY & INFORMATION
The reviewers are warmly welcomed. INSPIREE is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles. We are eager to collaborate with you in the publication of high-quality content. If you are interested in joining us, you can register on the link: Register Reviewers. please send us an e-mail<firstname.lastname@example.org>and include a brief description of your background, your professional accomplishments, and your experience as a reviewer. We look forward to hearing from interested parties and hope to continue to enhance the quality and timeliness of INSPIREE Journal review process.
All submitted manuscripts are evaluated by editorial staff. Those Manuscript evaluated by editors to be inappropiate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscript evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double bilnd Peer reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities : rejected, revision required, or accepted.
The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published. Review Process:
1. Initial Manuscript Evaluation
The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English/Indonesian language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review.
2. Type of Peer Review
INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review employs double bilnd reviewing, where the referees remain anonymous throughout the process. Referees are assigned to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated.
3. Referee Reports
Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work. Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.
4. Final Report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.
5. Editor’s Decision is final
Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
To ensure the integrity of anonymous peer-review, every effort should be made to prevent the identities of the authors and reviewers from being known to each other. This involves the authors, editors, and reviewers (who upload documents as part of their review) checking to see if the following steps have been taken with regard to the text and the file properties:
Complete "The Review" by the due date to the editorial office. Your recommendation for the article will be considered when the editor makes a final decision and your honest feedback is highly appreciated.
When you write a comment, please show the part of the comment that is only intended for the editor and parts that can be returned to the author.
Please do not hesitate to contact the editorial office with any questions or problems that you may encounter.
Link Reviewer Guideline and CV
|Aim & Scope|
|Peer Review Process|
|Peer Reviewers List|
|Instructions for Authors|
|Author Fees & APC|
|Open Access Policy|
|Screening Plagiarism Policy|
|Copyright and License|
|Sponsorship, Subscriber & MoU|
|Tuanku Tambusai Street, No. 23 Bangkinang City|
|Kampar Districts, Riau Province, Indonesia, 28412.|
|This work is licensed under a|
|Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.|